A technical dispute needs more than a plausible explanation. I examine the available material, test the relevant assumptions and explain what can be established, with a clear distinction between evidence, interpretation and uncertainty.
For legal professionals, organisations and parties seeking a structured technical assessment in ICT or cyber security matters.
Clarify the technical issues, the purpose of the opinion and the assignment. Identify the relevant systems, periods, parties and limits before deciding what examination is needed.
A precise technical question and an agreed scope of examination.
02
What evidence is available?
Review the origin, integrity and handling of the supplied material. Identify missing records, access conditions and other factors affecting what the evidence can support.
An evidence inventory with provenance, gaps and examination constraints.
03
How can the findings be tested?
Choose methods appropriate to the question and material. Record the steps, examine alternative explanations and distinguish observed behaviour from assumptions about events or responsibility.
Documented analysis with a traceable method and explicit uncertainties.
04
What conclusion is justified?
Answer the defined questions in a clear report. Connect each material conclusion to its basis, explaining assumptions, conflicting evidence and limitations relevant to its use.
A reasoned opinion that makes its supporting evidence and limits visible.
A technical position with an explicit basis.
An assessment of the available digital evidence and its limitations.
Documented technical findings and the methods used to obtain them.
An expert opinion answering the agreed questions.
A clear account of assumptions, uncertainties and further evidence needed.
Evidence · Analysis · Expert opinion
The technical question and procedural role matter.
A privately commissioned technical opinion does not itself constitute a court appointment. For work within proceedings, the mandate and procedural role must be clear. Applicable rules, authorised access and handling of evidence are established for the specific assignment. Technical guidance supports the method; it does not determine legal admissibility.
Official reference points
These sources explain the context. The applicable requirements and scope are established for each assignment.
Experience with ICT, security incidents and expert analysis.
I have led more than 50 expert engagements concerning cybercrime, security incidents and information security management, and I am a court-appointed expert in ICT and cyber security. The published experience and qualifications describe that background. Each new question still requires its own evidence and assessment.
Describe the question, the purpose of the assessment and the kinds of records available. We can determine the next step without disclosing case contents here. Evidence files and confidential details belong in an agreed direct exchange.
A clear starting point The first conversation clarifies your problem, the intended outcome, the available evidence and the possible scope of work. We agree the next step together.